SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS ON ARTICLE 21 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

September 30, 2020


NAME	MOBILE NO.	E-MAIL I’D
RANJEET KUMAR	8383098478, 9667769795	rk@courtkutchehry.com
JAI THAKUR	8130703334, 9355723300	jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com
RAJEEV RANJAN	9334553249	rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com
ASHOK MISHRA	9718327746	sales@courtkutchehry.com
RAVI KUMAR		ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS ON ARTICLE 21 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

1.	A.K. Gopalan Vs. The State Of Madras, (1950) 05 SC CK 0006
2.	Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1978) 01 SC CK 0026
3.	Hussainara Khatoon And Others Vs. Home Secretary, State Of Bihar, (1979) 05 SC CK 0021
4.	Vineet Narain And Others Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1997) 12 SC CK 0045
5.	Satwant Singh Sawhney Vs. D. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport Officer, Government Of India, New Delhi And Others, (1967) 04 SC CK 0034
6.	Kharak Singh Vs. The State Of U.P. And Others, (1962) 12 SC CK 0019
7.	Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration And Others Etc., (1978) 08 SC CK 0001
8.	Prem Shankar Shukla Vs. Delhi Administration, (1980) 04 SC CK 0040
9.	Pt. Parmanand Katara, Advocate Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1995) 01 SC CK 0074
10.	Consumer Education And Research Center And Others Vs. Union Of India And Others, (1995) 01 SC CK 0143
11.	LIC Of India And Another Vs. Consumer Education And Research Center And Others, (1995) 05 SC CK 0069
12.	Chameli Singh And Others Etc. Vs. State Of U.P. And Another, (1995) 12 SC CK 0104
13.	Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress And Others, (1990) 09 SC CK 0031
14.	Vishaka And Others Vs. State Of Rajasthan And Others, (1997) 08 SC CK 0003
15.	Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1978) 01 SC CK 0026
16.	Francis Coralie Mullin Vs. Administrator, Union Territory Of Delhi And Others, (1981) 01 SC CK 0001
17.	Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration And Others Etc., (1978) 08 SC CK 0001
18.	State Of Maharashtra Vs. Prabhakar Pandurang Sangzgiri And Another, (1965) 09 SC CK 0006
19.	Sher Singh And Others Vs. State Of Punjab, (1983) 03 SC CK 0008
20.	Attorney General Of India Vs. Lachma Devi And Others, (1985) 12 SC CK 0003
21.	Deena Alias Deen Dayal And Others Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Others, (1983) 09 SC CK 0017
22.	Babu Singh And Others Vs. State Of U.P., (1978) 01 SC CK 0030
23.	Zahira Habibullah Sheikh And Another Etc. Vs. State Of Gujarat And Others Etc., (2004) 05 SC CK 0002
24.	Hussainara Khatoon And Others Vs. Home Secretary, State Of Bihar, Patna, (1979) 03 SC CK 0005
25.	Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot Vs. State Of Maharashtra, (1978) 08 SC CK 0025
26.	Joginder Kumar Vs. State Of U.P. And Others, (1994) 04 SC CK 0040
27.	Mr ''X'' Vs. Hospital ''Z'', (1998) 09 SC CK 0071
28.	People''S Union Of Civil Liberties (PUCL) Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Another, (1996) 12 SC CK 0098
29.	In Re: Noise Pollution - Implementation of the Laws for restricting use of loudspeakers and high volume producing sound systems Forum, Prevention of Envn. and Sound Pollution, vs., (2005) 07 SC CK 0017
30.	Murli S. Deora Vs. Union Of India And Ors, (2001) 11 SC CK 0067
31.	Smt. Gian Kaur Vs. State Of Punjab, (1996) 03 SC CK 0087
32.	Olga Tellis And Others Vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation And Others Vayyapuri Kuppusami And Others, (1985) 07 SC CK 0019
33.	Sheela Barse Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Others, (1988) 08 SC CK 0069
34.	Miss. Mohini Jain Vs. State Of Karnataka And Others, (1992) 07 SC CK 0015
35.	M.C. Mehta Vs. Union Of India (UOI) And Others, (1997) 11 SC CK 0060
36.	Chameli Singh And Others Etc. Vs. State Of U.P. And Another, (1995) 12 SC CK 0104
37.	Rudul Sah Vs. State Of Bihar And Another, (1983) 08 SC CK 0019

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS ON ARTICLE 21 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps

Comments

SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON DIRECTING A FRESH/ DE NOVO INVESTIGATION EVEN AFTER INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN CONCLUDED AND POLICE REPORT SUBMITTED UNDER SECTION 173(2) OF THE CR. P.C. THOUGH UNDER SECTION 173 (8) OF CR.P.C. ONLY A FURTHER INVESTIGATION CAN BE ORDERED.

September 29, 2020

NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Neetu Kumar Nagaich Vs. State Of Rajasthan And Others, (2020) 09 SC CK 0026 A Full Bench of the Supreme Court while setting aside the Closure Report filed by the Police directed a de novo investigation by a fresh team of investigators to be headed by a senior police officer of the State consisting of efficient personnel well conversant with use of modern investigation technology also. No officer who was part of the investigating team leading to the closure report shall be part of the team conducting de novo investigation. The Supreme Court was of the view that normally when an investigation has been concluded and...

SUPREME COURT FULL BENCH JUDGMENT ON A REFERENCE ARISING OUT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN TWO DIVISION BENCH DECISIONS IN JOGINDER TULI VS. S.L. BHATIA, (1996) 10 SC CK 0017 AND OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. VS. MODERN CONSTRUCTION & CO., (2013) 10 SC CK 0043 WITH REGARD TO QUESTION OF LAW IF A PLAINT IS RETURNED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 10 AND 10A OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908, FOR PRESENTATION IN THE COURT IN WHICH IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INSTITUTED, WHETHER THE SUIT SHALL PROCEED DE NOVO OR WILL IT CONTINUE FROM THE STAGE WHERE IT WAS PENDING BEFORE THE COURT AT THE TIME OF RETURNING OF THE PLAINT.

September 29, 2020

NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com M/S. Exl Careers And Another Vs. Frankfinn Aviation Services Private Limited, (2020) 08 SC CK 0001 A Full Bench of the Supreme Court on a reference by a two Judge Bench opining a perceived conflict between two Division Bench decisions in Joginder Tuli vs. S.L. Bhatia, (1996) 10 SC CK 0017 and Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Modern Construction & Co., (2013) 10 SC CK 0043 with regard to question of law if a plaint is returned under Order VII Rule 10 and 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, for presentation in the court in which it should have been instituted, ...

SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON SECTION 142(2)(a) OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT

September 29, 2020

NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com M/S Himalaya Self Farming Group & Anr Vs. M/S Goyal Feed Suppliers, (2020) 09 SC CK 0037 A Single Bench of the Supreme Court held that under Section 142(2)(a) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, the court within whose jurisdiction the branch of the bank where the payee maintains the account is situated, will have jurisdiction to try the offence, if the cheque is delivered for collection through an account.

Search This Blog

IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS SUPREME COURT